Categories
Environment

Streaming conference

Streaming conference

This last virtual environment is practically the same as the previous one, but it can be used for more specific situations. This time the patient finds themselves again in an auditorium, sitting on the seats until the go to stage event is selected. However, the difference is that the lights are down, and there is a camera on the stage focussed directly at the lobby, that is to say where the patient will be placed. 

Therefore, this environment can be useful for patients who have to give a broadcast conference, or perhaps a talk that will be recorded or broadcast on television… 

SETTINGS VARIABLES

  • Amount of People
    • None 
    • Low (room practically empty)
    • Medium (room almost full of people)
    • Full (room completely full) 
  • Difficulty
    • Easy (audience that listens attentively and with approval)
    • Hard (audience that is more distracted or disinterested)

EVENTS

  • Go to the stage
    The patient goes onto the stage and is placed behind a table to start the presentation.
  • Positive question
    One listener from the public asks a question that is easy for the patient to answer. The healthcare professional can choose between a series of questions of this type, for example, if they can explain part of the presentation again.
  • Negative question
    In this case, one person from the audience asks a question that is more complicated to answer, something that could make the patient become nervous. The healthcare professional can choose from a series of questions of this type, for example, if they think that their proposal will work, or if they can highlight the weak points of their presentation.
  • Therapist positive feedback
    When the healthcare professional selects this event, one of the audience starts to speak although nothing is heard. Therefore, this button allows the healthcare professional to make a positive remark to the patient about their involvement but by introducing themselves into the virtual environment, so that the patient finds they are even more immersed in that environment.
  • Therapist negative feedback
    This event develops in exactly the same way as the previous setting, but it is reserved for the healthcare professional to make a more critical or negative remark about the patient’s involvement.
  • Applause
    The audience applauds the speaker.
  • Spectator leaves room
    One person gets up and leaves the room.
  • Distraction
    Choice of a series of distractions: yawning, mobile phone, telephone vibration, laughter, coughing.

APPENDIX

List of positive questions

  1. It’s evident that you are passionate about what you’ve explained. Where did the interest come from?
  2. I’ve attended similar conferences before on the same topic but I’ve never been as enthusiastic about it as today. Do you recommend any author or some reading related to what you told us today?
  3. What’s been the biggest obstacles you’ve had to overcome when preparing the subject?
  4. You’ve approached the matter in a very innovative way. You’ve also explained it very clearly and concisely, is this your first time giving this conference?
  5. Thank you very much for your presentation, it was fascinating. I would like to ask you though, what would you highlight from everything that you just explained?
  6. Are you satisfied with the results of your presentation? Could you talk a bit more on the argument that you’ve exposed?
  7. Do you think you could come back another day to repeat the presentation in front of a larger audience?
  8. Could you give an example by placing it in a different context?
  9. Excuse me, I didn’t understand your last point, could you explain it again?
  10. These results are promising, what impact do you think it may have in the future?
  11. Will you make another presentation during these upcoming weeks? I’d like to attend.
  12. What do you think is the scope or limit of what you have just described?

List of negative questions

  1. Could you highlight the strengths and weaknesses of your proposal?
  2. What resources are available for you to implement your plan?
  3. I don’t quite understand the last thing you explain. Could you give another example?
  4. What difficulties do you think may arise in the future?
  5. It started off so well, but the delivery of the findings isn’t as clear. Could you please summarize them again, briefly?
  6. Do you think the results that you’ve shown are realistic?
  7. Do you think that your proposal will work? The current situation doesn’t seem to be the most suitable.
  8. Can you prove what you just said? In my opinion, your argument shows some weaknesses.
  9. “You have made some very interesting proposals, although some of them are a little bit too daring. Have you thought about how you’ll proceed?”
  10. Are you sure that this information comes from reliable sources?
  11. Don’t you think that your point of view has certain limitations? How did you choose your presentation’s approach?
  12. Some of your conclusions seem outdated. Are you aware of the latest trends on this matter?